COPY OF ORDER
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI
Company Appeal (AT) No. 287 of 2019
IN THE MATTER Of:
Mr. Mahendra G.Wadhwani .....Appellant
Vs.
M/s. Reed Relays & Electronics India Ltd. & Ors. ......Respondents
Present :
For Appellant: Mr. Virender Ganda, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vipul
Ganda, Ms. Shreya Jain, Ms. Alexandra, Advocates
For Respondents: Mr. Delep Goswami, Mr. Anirrud Goswami,
Advocates
Mr. Pradip Das, Advocate for R-2
O R D E R
18.10.2019 - Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that earlier
Division Bench order dated 4th October, 2017 passed by the Tribunal was set
aside by this Appellate Tribunal and the Single Bench of the Tribunal cannot
state that the said order was legal.
Let notice be issued on Respondent.
Mr. Delep Goswami with Mr. Anirrud, Advocate accepts notice on behalf
of 1st Respondent. Mr. Das, Advocate appears on behalf of 2nd Respondent.
.....contd.
2
Learned counsel for the Appellant will serve a copy of paper-book on them
in course of the day.
Respondents will file reply-affidavit along with Vakalatnama within 10
days. Rejoinder, if any, may be filed by the Appellant within 10 days thereafter.
Let notice be issued on rest of the Respondents by speed post. Requisite
along with process fee be filed by 21st October, 2019. If the appellant provides the
e-mail address of rest of the respondent, let notice be also issued through e-mail.
Place the case for ‘admission’ (after notice) on 27th November, 2019
before the Bench presided by Hon’ble Justice A. I. S. Cheema, Member (Judicial)
of this Appellate Tribunal whose Bench passed the earlier order.
In the meantime, the impugned order dated 18th September, 2019 passed
by the Adjudicating Authority (‘National Company Law Tribunal’) Chennai
Bench shall remain stayed till next date.
[Justice S. J. Mukhopadhaya]
Chairperson
[Justice A. I. S. Cheema] Member (Judicial)
[Kanthi Narahari] Member (Technical)
ss/sk
Company Appeal (AT) No. 287 of 2019
---------------------------
Copy of Order Sent to RareIndianShares.Com by
Message
Please find NCLAT order copy relating to Reed Relays " STAY ORDER"
THANKS & REGARDS,
TUSHAR S AGARWAL
AHMEDABAD
M# 98246 01977
M# 94261 31075
.==========================
Also please read :-
Compulsory Buyback / Capital Reduction - Bad in Law - Are Anti Public Shareholders - Reed Relays Latest
===============================
old post
Reed Relays Cancels Public Shares @ Rs.107- Shareholders Aggrieved
Blog Gratitude to :-
Mahendra G. Wadhwani,
501-506 Business Plaza,
33 Gazdar Bandh Road,
Santacruz (West), Mumbai - 400 054
Mob.: 09820140363 / 9322530308
for mailing a copy of Hon'ble NCLT Chennai Order dt. 04/10/2017, Order No.CP 21 / 66 ( 1 ) / CB / 2017 , under Section 66 ( 1 ) of The Companies Act 2013.
The operative part of the Judgement is that Hon'ble NCLT has accepted Reed Relays ' case in totality . Shares of Non Promoters would be compulsorily cancelled @ Rs. 107 ( as determined by valuers appointed by Reed Relays.
------------------
The Blog wishes to place on record the spirited objection put up by the leading Share Dealer of Chennai , Dilip Surana .
-------------------------
.
Dilip Surana
Strides Financial Services
"Arihant Plaza"
84-85,Wall Tax Road, Ist floor
Park Town, Above SBI
CHENNAI 600003
Phone No 044-25350312, 25350313
Fax No 044-42371148
Mobile 9840278351 95000 95121
dilipmsurana@gmail.com
-------------------------------------------------
We wish more such Pro Public, Pro Active Shareholders Guides come forward,
Great Work : Mr. Dilip Surana
--------------------
please , also read
Activist Shareholders Should Join Board of Directors
please click
=======================
Blog Comments
Shareholders should not give up . Resources should be contributed ( Contri ). An Appeal should be filed
with and an Interim Stay applied for
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
http://compat.nic.in/
Grounds of Appeal
Hon'ble NCLT has erred in observing that NCLT cannot increase the price of compulsory acquisition . It can as was done by the Hon'ble Hiigh Court of Bombay in the case of Cadbury.
As per Hon,ble Bombay High Court , aggrieved shareholders can seek Court's permission to appoint their own valuers.
Company's Valuers are selected / paid by the Company. So, they can be biased.
please click
-------------------------
Blog Comments Please consult
thass18@legalserviceindia.com
========================
old post
Sheer Loot -Reed Relay Compulsory Buyback @ Rs.107- Experts Say
Letter by a Shareholder to the Company :-
Dear Sir:
I have received your postal Ballot Notice regarding compulsory acquisition of non-promoter shareholdings. In this connection the proposal seems to me a dishonest, illegal and criminal proposal for illegal enrichment at the cost of the non-promoter shareholders who have believed in your entrepreneurship and invested in your Company by going through your published Balance Sheet of several years. Till date we were not aware that you had criminal and illegal intentions to cheat the shareholders of your own company. We were under the impression that the promoters are all people of high ethics, morality, equity and fair. However the dark side of you has come out openly through this compulsory acquisition proposal which I am sure will be a black mark for you for generations to come.
Your reasoning for the compulsory acqusition as mentioned in the explanatory statement in the garb of SEBI guidelines etc are all deliberate falsehood with ulterior motives of personal enrichment. In the process it is distressing to see two professionals 1) P. Pattabiraman and Co. Chartered Accountants and 2) Mr. Adit N. Bhuva, Practising Company Secretary are also colluding with you for your illegal proposal.
The proposal raises fundamental questions of investments in Securities of Public Limited Companies by investors and the way in which corporate governance are handled by fraudulent promoters like you. The systematic mis-use of SEBI guidelines, misuse of the name of High Court, Companies 2013 etc.in your proposal are a big challenge.
I have decided to take up the matter with appropriate legal forums to see that you are prevented from going ahead with this proposal.
In the meanwhile you are requested to kindly forward me a copy of valuation report of P. Pattabiramen & Co, Chartered Accountants who has determined a fair value of the shares.
P P Zibi jose
Shareholder
=========================
As per my view fair value is above 400.
Dhruval Shah
(M)- 9898150967/8000133721(whatsup)
================================
Reed relays& electronics India ltd proposing to Cancel Non Promoter Holding @ 107 per share. Very Unfair Treatment to minority shareholders.
Book Value Rs 345
Cash and Bank Balance Per Share Rs 210
Dilip Surana
Mobile 09840278351
-----------------------.
OLD POSTS
Reed Relay - Shareholders Unite to Get Cancelled @ Compulsory Acquisition
Dear Sir,
I would like to invite Share holders of Reed Relay though this EFFECTIVE PLATFORM to protest against the company
I am holding just 212 shares and that to purchased not at very high price but to protect other shareholders and to protest AGAINST THE DADAGIRI OF THE PROMOTERS.
" I REQUEST THE SHAREHOLDERS TO VOTE THROUGH THE ELECTRONIC MEDIA ONLY i.e. though evoting only. Because it may happen that promoters intentionally do not put entry of the ballot in the inward register, may ask the post man not to deliver the same before the expiry date, may ,may , do any thing as they like . but if the same is done through " EVOTING" we have perfect record officially on the website .
i have yesterday voted through the evoting platform and is very easy to use the same.
IT IS MR. NARENDRA MODI WHO HAS PUT A SURGICAL STRIKE AGAINST THE BLACK MONEY NOW IT IS OUR TURN TO PUT SURGICAL STRIKE AGAINST THE GREEDY AND CHEATER PROMOTER WHO HAS USED OUR MONEY TO FLOURISH THE COMPANY AND WHEN THERE INTENTION IS OVER THEY THREW AWAY LIKE ANY THING.
JAGO SHARE HOLDER JAGO.
JAI HIND.
THANKS & REGARDS,
TUSHAR S AGARWAL
AHMEDABAD
M# 09824601977
-------------------------
OLD POSTS
Reed Relays @ Rs.107-Compulsory Buy Back- Shareholders Protest
ONE MORE COMPANY HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE GROUP OF COMPULSORY BUY BACK
THE NAME IS REED RELAYS AND ELECTRONICS INDIA LIMITED
THEY HAVE SENT THE POSTAL FORM THROUGH SPEED POST FOR PASSING THE RESOLUTION FOR COMPULSORY EXTINGUISHED THE SHARES OF MINORITY SHARE HOLDERS @ 107/-
PLEASE KNOW THE FACT
B.V 350+
DIVIDEND PAYING (FOR THE YEAR 15-16 DIVIDEND PAID RS. 1.6
SMALL EQUITY OF JUST RS. 1 ODD CRORE
PLEASE GUIDE ME AS I DONT WANT TO SURRENDER THE SHARES @ 107/-
TUSHAR S AGARWAL
AHMEDABAD
M# 09824601977
---------------
old post
Alfa Laval ( India ) Kicks Out Loyal Remainder Public Shareholders
Alfa Laval ( India ) has become the latest MNC to follow the example of Cadbury India, in compulsorily buying back the shares of Non Promoter remaining Loyal shareholders through a Court order.
The payment made is @ Rs. 4000/. same as was given four and a half years ago for voluntary buy back / delisting.
--------------------------------------------------
Alfa Laval ( India ) Limited Delisted on 19-04-12 at Exit Price of Rs. 4000 Per Share.Exit Window was available Till 18-04-13.
-------------
We salute all those share holders of Cadbury India who are steadfastly giving their time and money in pursuing the High Court case against compulsory acquisition of shares from remaining minority share holders.
There are around 8,159 remaining non promoter shareholders who together own 2.42% stake in Cadbury India.
We strongly feel that Government of India and SEBI should amend the laws so that Companies using their " brute majority " are not able to " compulsorily " buy out minority shareholders at what they perceive to be the " fair value " . Delisting may be OK . But a High Court Order for selective share reduction ( of Non Promoter Share holders ) is a different matter altogether.
1 ) If a company wishes to buy back compulsorily then in the voting procedure the majority holder ( promoter ) should be debarred from voting . Only the small share holders should have the Right to vote on that particular Resolution .
2 ) As in the case of land acquisition , the Company should state valid reasons for acquisition of remaining shares ( In Cadbury 's case the remaining 2 odd % share holders can , frankly , in no way alter the Company 's policies.) Only a few more Annual Reports are to be despatched and a few more chairs at the AGM . ( Cadbury India Limited 's shares were delisted w.e.f 20-01-2003 )
3 ) There should be a soletium ( a premium over and above the fair value to compensate for compulsory buy out ) of 50 %
If the Company feels that the rate it is offering is " FAIR " then it should , also , be willing to offer to sell its entire majority holding at that rate . The minority share holders ( and other Indian share holders ) should have a Right of Pre emption at that " FAIR " rate. For example if Cadbury India Limited feels that Rs.2000 is a " fair rate " then Indian shareholders in general should be given an opportunity to form a SPV ( Special Purpose Vehicle ) Company which ( with suitable debt equity Leveraged Buy out ) and buy at the same rate the majority shares from the Promoters. A period of 6 months should be kept for giving this opportunity to Non Promoter Indian shareholders
However , we sincerely wish that Cadbury India Limited offers its remaining loyal share holders " Kuchh Meetha " and in New Year 's " Shubh Arambh " withdraws this move.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regarding the move , earlier of Cadbury India Limited and , now , by Shakti Met-Dor Limited :-
Compulsory Buy Back of Shares ( selectively from minority Non promoter Share holders ) is violative of Fundamental Right of Equality enshrined in the Constitution of India
Such a move creates two separate and unequal classes of Shareholders , i.e. Promoter Share Holders and Non Promoter Share Holders .
Please read this very informative Post :-
--------------------Regarding Compulsory Cancellation of Shares Moves by
Cadbury India Limited
Shakti Met-Dor Limited ((subsidiary of German giant Hormann Beteilgungs Gmbh )
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
============
new post
Dear All,
Kindly follow below steps to stop compulsory Buy back by RRE.
2) Send duly filled and signed postal ballot with Registered AD
4) If possible, Issue Legal Notice to promoter.
Please circulate into your group as many as possible who have shares of RRE.
Regards,
Jignesh Gohel
(M) 9408709494
===================
HUM MEHNAT KASH ISS DUNIYA SE
JAB APNA HISSA MANGEY GEY
IK BAGH NAHI; IKK KHET NAHIN
HUM SAARI DUNIYA MANGEY GEY
( Josh Malihabadi )
-----------------
Saadda Haq , Ethey Rak
=============================================
Promoter intention is wrong and accumulated good number of shares which are undue transfered into their name. They casted thier votes "In Favour" of buyback only else others are opposing the offer.Request you to take last step as that we 4-5 Investor will put our offer and take over promoter stack at more than offered price.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment